Victory!

Due to the overwhelming number of calls, emails and opinions of outraged Americans, the $700 billion bailout plan has been nixed! See?? The little people do have the power!!

McCain had something to say about it, talking about “fixing the problem”. Could you be any more ambiguous? Obama’s comment was about something along the lines of ”getting it done”. As in hurry up and drowned the nation in debt despite what the people whom I represent have to say about it. (They are still our representatives, aren’t they?)

I’m fairly pleased. My democratic Congresswoman Shelley Berkley voted a big fat “No”. I’d like to think our emails and phone calls throughout the weekend had something to do with that.

We’re not quite out of the woods yet, as they are “reworking” the bill to offer it up for another vote this week. After this gloating victory, I’ll be staying tuned for more calls of action in the coming days.

Why I Will Be “Wasting” My Vote

I’ve heard it said too many times that voting for anyone other than a Republican or Democrat is a “wasted vote”. I cannot tell you how frustrating an idea I find that to be. I’ve heard all the reasons; a third-party candidate can’t win so why vote for them or if you don’t vote the lesser of two evils, the greater evil might win. Seriously people? Is this what it’s come to? Voting based not on preference but on popularity, like some high school contest? I think it was Jesse Ventura that said voting is not a horse race. We’re not betting on who we think will win. We’re telling others who best represents our views.

So for those that are curious, here are all the reasons I’ll be “wasting my vote” this year:

1. Voting for a candidate other than the best representative of your views has the exact opposite effect. Since the candidate already knows that your vote is in hand, he can then concentrate on moving the platform AWAY from your wishes, in order to court the votes of people with beliefs far from your own.

Many people who like Libertarian ideas always vote for Republicans. What does the party do to reward them? They make policies to win over moderate liberals. Similarly, many people who prefer Green Party ideas always vote for Democrats, and so the Democrats ignore them and make policies to win over moderate conservatives. Either way, the voters get the opposite of what they wanted, as the Democrats and Republicans both move toward the political center. Even Democrats and Republicans are getting screwed as their party plays politics as usual, instead of standing up for their ideals.

2. If the greater of two evils was to win it wouldn’t be my fault, because I didn’t vote for him. Nor would it be my fault that I didn’t vote for the lesser of two evils. The fault lies in the hands of anyone voting based either on popularity or fear, rather than policies, issues and ideals. Keep in mind that voting is suppose to be FOR something, not AGAINST something.

You personally have only one vote. Like it or not, you are powerless to turn the results of a democratic election. This being the case, your one vote counts for something only in the sense that it represents your approval of some set of principles. Voting is a means of conveying information about what you believe. If you ignore your principles then this information is lost, and your vote really is wasted.

3. I do not wish to take part in the status-quo. I believe in real change, not just change of hands. And real change will never come by supporting that which we do not agree with out of fear of who might win if we don’t. I think we’re on a slippery slope to fascism and both parties are to blame. My supporting the status-quo with my vote sends the message that I will tolerate what they are doing. (Click here to watch the documentary, America: Freedom to Fascism to fully understand my view.)

4. My vote may be extremely unlikely to affect the outcome of the election. But it can influence policy. A vote for one of the two main candidates will be lost in the mass of voters, while a vote for a minor candidate, especially if he gets enough to make the margin of difference between the other two, will have far more influence. It will impel the other two parties to appeal to the voters for that minor candidate, and that may come to be as important if not more important than their main positions. So my vote can be a drop in the ocean or a splash in the pool. I’ll go for the one that gets more attention.

5. Voting for the lesser of two evils, still results in evil in the White House and I refuse to take any part in that.

6. On a more personal note, Both McCain and Obama support this ridiculous “bailout” plan. I don’t find the solution to all our problems to be in the form of more government. And you don’t save a sinking ship by adding more water to the hull. Big Government got us into this mess, Bigger Government won’t get us out. Neither of the major candidates seem to understand this fully, therefore they do not share my utmost ideals. See #1.

So there ya have it. All my thought and research laid out for you. Call it a wasted vote or call it a protest vote. Either way I plan to send a message by supporting my third-party candidate this year. Whoever you choose to vote for, I simply hope it’s a vote for the right reasons and someone who best represents your views.

Financial Meltdown

Does anyone else feel that we are just delaying the inevitable with the same tactics that got us here in the first place?

Our country is bankrupt. We may not know it yet because the bill hasn’t come due, but we are. The two-party system wants to continue pretending it can be saved by throwing more money at it that we don’t have in the first place, burying us deeper. Meanwhile they’ll continue throwing money at any other program that they think will win the vote. Why is no one asking the trillion dollar question: How the hell do they intend to pay for it all?

McBama both want change all right. But it’s not the right kind of change. Ron Paul knew what he was talking about but couldn’t fight through the iron-clad bars of the system we put ourselves in. Bob Barr talks about it but seems to be focusing more on his unfair treatment than waving the mayday flag from the rooftops, so no one wants to pay attention.

Oh we’re going to get change folks. But it’s not going to be what either candidates had hoped. And unless the Fed pulls its head out of the sand and its hand out of our pockets, it’s not going to look good. I just hope with a global economic collapse, China doesn’t come out on top.

I heard a quote the other day; “If voting changed anything, they’d make it illegal.” With Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dumb taking center stage, I’m kinda prone to agree with Emma Goldman there.

HSLDA Pushes Amendment

Mike Farris, of the HSLDA, is now pushing for a Constitutional Amendment to protect parental rights. This is a wolf in sheep’s clothing and I’d like to briefly explain to you why we should NOT support this act.

1. Our constitution already protects our parental rights. Why the need to spell it out? Yes, our rights have come under attack but the real problem is not the Constitution but the myriad of politicians ignoring the Constitution. What our first goal should be is to protect our rights by protecting our Constitution.

2. When you demand an amendment, any amendment, you are inviting government into your homes, giving them too much information and too much say. Then you have to fight to force them out again. Our constitution states that while not all rights are not listed in the Constitution that does not negate them. But by allowing government to come in and rule on such a matter, gives them the right to turn the amendment down, which forces us all to acknowledge that the federal government has jurisdiction over our children.

3. Approximately 30 states have already called for a Constitution Convention (Con Con). Once such a convention is called, the Constitution is wide open for debate and changes, in every area. This is a very real and very scary possibility that can lead to some serious problems. It is important that we understand the possible implications of any amendment.

Please remind other homeschoolers and parents that our parental rights are already protected and that we do not need to invite the government into our personal lives to tell us so!

Another political discussion

Here’s how it went:

Z: “Mom, I think if even Ron Paul wins, they will just lie and say he didn’t.”

Me: “Why do you think that?”

Z: “Well, there are red states and there are blue states. And you know when the guy in office now, what’s his name?”

Me: “Bush?”

Z: “Yeah when he was running against the other guy. What was his name?”

Me: “Kerry?”

Z: “Yeah well I heard that one of the states cheated and the guy who was counting the votes liked Bush and he said he won when he really didn’t. So I think that’s going to happen again.”

Me: “But why do you think they would do that?”

Z: “Cuz they don’t like Ron Paul cuz he’s different.”

Hmm…

Where he heard red state/blue state or anything about the ’04 elections is beyond me but it’s not failing to amaze me how much he is learning and actually caring about this whole process.

And I love, love, love that he’s thinking about these things for himself and formulating his own opinions.

On another note, I saw a cool shirt online. It said “Educational Refugee: Enjoying Asylum in the Real World”. I gotta get it!